6 ECTS credits
180 h study time

Offer 1 with catalog number 4021506ENR for all students in the 1st semester at a (E) Master - advanced level.

Semester
1st semester
Enrollment based on exam contract
Impossible
Grading method
Grading (scale from 0 to 20)
Can retake in second session
Yes
Taught in
English
Faculty
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
Department
Educatiewetenschappen
Educational team
Sarah Dury (course titular)
An-Sofie Smetcoren
Dorien Brosens
Activities and contact hours

24 contact hours Lecture
6 contact hours Seminar, Exercises or Practicals
Course Content

This educational course provides students insight into co-creation, innovation and social design in the social adult educational sector. These concepts are strongly interconneceted and will be discussed during the lessons from a theoretical as well as a practice perspective. Among other things, the following topics will be handled:

- Background and meaning of the concepts participation and co-creation;
- Providing insight into social innovation and community engaged research and learning;
- Background and meaning of the concept ‘social design’ in research and practice;
- We deal with different methods that support ‘participation, co-creation and innovation’; e.g. action research, developing personas, human-centered design.

During a few lessons guest speakers will approach these concepts from a practical perspective.

In addition, the students will become familiar with these concepts through a group task.

Course material
Digital course material (Required) : Reader
Additional info

The reader will be provided to the students on Canvas.

 

Learning Outcomes

Algemene competenties

- The students constructively works together with others on a common project.
- The student can analyze scientific articles on the chosen topic and apply theories and models that were discussed in the lessons to the texts.
- The student can formulate creative proposals for social intervention and action in the domain of the social-cultural sector.
- The student can develop as a team an academic interdisciplinary advise to answer a specific challenge faced by organizations in the domain of the social-cultural sector.
- The student can diagnose, analyze and if necessary/ desired further investigate the agogical problem statement in a dynamic and unsecure civil context. They can also develop solutions for using one of the three central concepts of this course (co-creatioin, innovation and social design).
- The student can adjust, with a team, and in interaction with representative(s) from civil society organizations, formulated project goals and plans when and if necessary.
- The student can demonstrate mastery in presenting and communicating the developed academic interdisciplinary advice to an academic and civil society audience.
- The student can apply project and innovative mananagement skils in an adult educational context through the assignment.

- Departing from a critical analysis, the student can formulate proposals to optimaly coordinate professional and social networks and processes that are aimed to reach systemic change.
- The student will bring the theoretical insights and methodological knowledge and skills into practive by working for and with an external organization in the domain of the social-cultural sector.

De student werkt constructief samen met anderen aan een gemeenschappelijk project.
De student kan in groep wetenschappelijke teksten over het gekozen thema analyseren en toepassen op de theorieën en modellen die in de lessen werden besproken.

De student is in staat om de agogische probleemstelling binnen een dynamische en onzekere maatschappelijke context te diagnosticeren en te analyseren.

De student is in staat om de agogische probleemstelling verder te onderzoeken en er oplossingen voor te ontwerpen/creëren op basis van 1 van de 3 onderdelen (co-creatie, innovatie en social design,) door middel van een project (zie groepswerk).

De student is in staat om eigen bevindingen en probleemoplossingen mondeling en schriftelijk te communiceren op een emancipatorisch gericht wijze.

De student kan project- en innovatie management-skills toepassen in een agogische context.

De student brengt de theoretische inzichten en methodologische kennis en vaardigheden in de praktijk door te werken voor en met een externe organisatie in het domein van de sociaal-culturele sector.

Grading

The final grade is composed based on the following categories:
Oral Exam determines 30% of the final mark.
LEC Teamwork determines 50% of the final mark.
LEC Presentation determines 20% of the final mark.

Within the Oral Exam category, the following assignments need to be completed:

  • Theoretical test with a relative weight of 30 which comprises 30% of the final mark.

    Note: Theoretical questions related to the course content and theoretical questions related to the topic of the group task also have a a relative weight of 30 which comprises 30% of the total mark.

Within the LEC Teamwork category, the following assignments need to be completed:

  • Group work with a relative weight of 50 which comprises 50% of the final mark.

    Note: The group tasks determines 50% of the final mark.

Within the LEC Presentation category, the following assignments need to be completed:

  • Presentation group task with a relative weight of 20 which comprises 20% of the final mark.

    Note: The presentation of the group tasks has a relative weight of 20 which comprises 20% of the total mark.

Additional info regarding evaluation

- The final grading is based on the following categories: The group tasks determines 50% of the final mark, the presentation of this group tasks and the theoretical questions related to the topic of the group tasks determine the other 50% of the final mark.
- Partial scores cannot be transferred to the second sitting in August and the task submitted in the second sitting cannot be the same as the task submitted in the first sitting.
- The presentation of the group tasks has a relative weight of 20 which comprises 20% of the total mark. Theoretical questions related to the course content and theoretical questions related to the topic of the group task also have a a relative weight of 30 which comprises 30% of the total mark.
- The student must have participated in all parts of the exams – otherwise he/she receives an ‘absent’ on the grade sheet.
- A peer assessment (mandatory) will be used to establish the individual grading on the group work. Students must assess themselves and fellow group members on a number of criteria. The result of this is an individual adjustment factor. The adjustment factor will be used to individualise the group point (= the inherent value of the group work). This is done by multiplying the group point by the adjustment factor.
- The group work is quoted at 10/20, and has a weight of 50% in the quotation of the entire course unit.
- If a student does not complete a peer assessment within the set deadline, the lecturer may decide to use the maximum deduction of points.
- The lecturer always has the last word and can decide to increase or decrease the adjustment factor, or even not to take it into account at all, if the obtained scores turn out to be unreliable.
- This decision will in principle only be taken in exceptional cases, but will always be based on clear arguments, analyses, and/or additional observations/discussions.

    Allowed unsatisfactory mark
    The supplementary Teaching and Examination Regulations of your faculty stipulate whether an allowed unsatisfactory mark for this programme unit is permitted.

    Academic context

    This offer is part of the following study plans:
    Master of Adult Education: Profile Social Studies (only offered in Dutch)
    Master of Adult Education: Profile Education Studies (only offered in Dutch)
    Master of Educational Sciences: Standaard traject
    Master of Teaching in Behavioural Sciences: agogische wetenschappen (120 ECTS, Etterbeek) (only offered in Dutch)