3 ECTS credits
90 h study time

Offer 2 with catalog number 1022244BNR for all students in the 1st semester at a (B) Bachelor - advanced level.

Semester
1st semester
Enrollment based on exam contract
Impossible
Grading method
Grading (scale from 0 to 20)
Can retake in second session
Yes
Enrollment Requirements
You must have taken 'Rechtsmethodologie I', before you can enroll in this course. This enrolment requirement applies only to students within the Bachelor of Laws (standard track). Only working students can register for this course. Day students can register for courses with a code ending in R.
Taught in
French
Faculty
Academic Language Centre
Department
Academic Center for Language Education
Educational team
Nefertari Vanden Bulcke
Laurence Balencourt
Voorzitter ACTO (course titular)
Activities and contact hours
20 contact hours Seminar, Exercises or Practicals
48 contact hours Independent or External Form of Study
Course Content

The ‘français juridique’ course takes place under the form of practical lessons. To the extent possible, we take the student's starting level into account and operate according to a differentiation model so that every student can make progress in foreign language acquisition, however, a good basic knowledge of French (B1/B2 level) is both an advantage and an added value.

The pedagogy used stems from the CLIL method (Content and Language Integrated Learning). Through CLIL, students are exposed to non-language-oriented content with the aim of promoting multilingualism interactively. The content provided leans towards the general Law programme and deepens various law-related/legal topics that are systematically adapted to current events.

Specific attention is paid to legal vocabulary through 7 modules focusing on different themes and branches of law (Belgian context). Through ‘distance projects’, punctual grammatical (problem) points are addressed (via Projet Voltaire) and oral language skills are worked on (via the Tandem project ism the ULB). One of the major assignments involves making a plea/argument before an audience. For this, specific argumentation techniques are employed and principles from rhetoric are used.
In terms of cross-curricular objectives, the course contributes to active citizenship through pedagogical strategies that, for example, question our relationship to regulation, affirm the appearance of ‘the common good’, support the principle of equality of opportunity and encourage a sense of critical engagement.

During the first lesson, the precise modalities about the content, the evaluation criteria, the interrelationship of the subpoints, the organisation and the course will be explained and provided via a vade mecum (changes are always possible). The vade mecum therefore contains all concrete information and is a binding document. This also applies to working students.

Course material
Digital course material (Required) : Aanvullende (audiovisuele) documenten, Canvas
Digital course material (Required) : Documenten: lijst met vakgerichte woordenschat, taaltechnieken en selectie vakgerichte teksten, Canvas
Handbook (Required) : À la découverte du français juridique, Elke Weylandt & Liesbeth Vandenbulcke, Brugge, Die Keure, 9980000052197, 2023
Digital course material (Required) : Les grandes plaidoiries des ténors du barreau, Syllabus Rechtstmethodologie, Matthieu Aron, Mareuil Edition
Additional info

We work with authentic (professional) texts, audiovisual documents and vocabulary exercises on Canvas. The legal jargon is taken from the handbook À la découverte du français juridique (Elke Weylandt & Liesbeth Vandenbulcke) and consists of 7 modules, arranged according to different themes and branches of law. All teaching materials are made available, to the extent possible, on Canvas.


Students' attendance during the working classes in Français juridique is compulsory. Students who are unwarrantedly absent during classes will be referred to the 2nd session. In case of more than 3 lawful absences, the student will also be referred to second session. With regard to substantiating absences at evaluation moments and their proper conduct, please refer to art. 111 and 112 of the Education and Examination Regulations with the faculty additions of the Faculty of Law and Criminology regarding medical certificates.

To pass this course, some conditions apply:

  • Students must participate in all evaluation criteria (in the form of (sub)tests, assignments, distance projects, etc. as part of continuous assessment). If a student does not participate in all evaluation criteria, he/she will be marked ‘AFW’ on the marksheet.
  • Students must score at least half the points on the evaluation component ‘pleading exercise’ which is at 50% of the points. If students score unsatisfactory on this part, they will be given max 07/20 as the final score and will be referred to second sit. In second sitting, they then retake all the assessment items for which they scored a fail.
  • Students who fail one of the other evaluation items (vocabulary test, Projet Voltaire, presentations) must obtain an average of 10/20 in total (including the grade for the pleading exercise, for which they must obtain at least half, see point 2). If they get an average lower than 10/20, they will be referred to second sitting and must retake the parts for which they got a failing grade.
Learning Outcomes

General competencies

Learning outcomes:

  • Students maintain and further develop their communication skills (reading, listening, writing and speaking);
  • Students learn general French and basic legal vocabulary in French and are able to use the acquired vocabulary in a group discussion/presentation;
  • Students master general and subject-oriented reading comprehension techniques that allow them to extract key information from texts and to structure and articulate this information;
  • Students are able to use the acquired argumentation techniques within the discipline of rhetoric (o. a.o. assessing, refuting arguments, conceding, (not) agreeing, convincing, etc.) in discussions and pleading exercises;
  • Students will master social skills including cooperative action and compromising in a peaceful manner;
  • Students will be able to form opinions on contemporary subject-related topics and convey their point of view in a structured, clear manner in a formal language register.

General competences:

  • Writing skills: formal language register, structure, clear formulations, technical jargon, style;
  • Speaking skills: formal language register, structure, clear formulations, technical jargon, style;
  • Listening skills: be able to follow complex discussions, understand different accents, learn to actively listen to others;
  • Reading skills: be able to dissect and understand complex texts, grasp the essence.
  • Critical thinking: showing interest in broad social themes and daring to think in an interdisciplinary way, being critical of one's own discipline, daring to transcend one's own mental, geographical and cultural boundaries, showing active citizenship, being able to feed one's own curiosity.

Grading

The final grade is composed based on the following categories:
Other Exam determines 100% of the final mark.

Within the Other Exam category, the following assignments need to be completed:

  • Permanente evaluatie with a relative weight of 100 which comprises 100% of the final mark.

Additional info regarding evaluation

A plagiarism detection system will be used when submitting the written version of the ‘plaidoyer/réquisitoire’.

There will be no communication on partial marks during the semester.

In case of unwarranted absence during an evaluation moment, the student is immediately referred to second session time. In case of legitimate absence (see conditions in examination regulations) during an evaluation moment, the student must inform his/her respective teacher in advance. Please note that there is no catch-up time for the written test (vocabulary test).

Students who wish to take part in the second session must notify their respective lecturer by e-mail at the latest 1 week after the official announcement of the marks via the faculty. Late notifications will not be taken into account and will invalidate the right to participate in second session.

No partial exemptions will be transferred after second session.

Special arrangements are provided for working students, which are handed out and explained through a vade mecum at the beginning of the semester.

Info regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence: specifically for the oral presentations, the use of AI is allowed to a limited extent, provided that the student does so appropriately, reports on it openly and does not use the AI itself as a primary source. More detailed instructions on this will be included in the vade-mecum. Generally, we also refer to the conditions formulated in the faculty's examination regulations, specifically this sentence : "The student may not present work generated by AI as his own. In no case may reference be made to primary source material where the work and source citations have been generated by generative AI applications and these applications are not mentioned. Any source to which the student refers must have been consulted, reviewed and processed by the student himself in support of his work. (...)". In other words, it is crucial that the student's work represents his or her own research and reflections on the topic. Teachers must be able to assess the student's own skills (including mastery of the topic, language skills and critical thinking), as well as his or her skills in handling Chatgpt or other digital tools.

Allowed unsatisfactory mark
The supplementary Teaching and Examination Regulations of your faculty stipulate whether an allowed unsatisfactory mark for this programme unit is permitted.

Academic context

This offer is part of the following study plans:
Bachelor of Laws: default (only offered in Dutch)