15 ECTS credits
450 h study time

Offer 2 with catalog number 6024298FNW for working students in the 1st and 2nd semester at a (F) Master - specialised level.

Semester
1st and 2nd semester
Enrollment based on exam contract
Impossible
Grading method
Grading (scale from 0 to 20)
Can retake in second session
Yes
Enrollment Requirements
Alvorens de Masterproef SORE te kunnen opnemen, dient de student minstens gelijktijdig ingeschreven te zijn op alle plichtstudiedelen uit module I en voor 10 studiepunten op keuzestudiedelen uit module II.
Taught in
Dutch
Faculty
Faculty of Law and Criminology
Department
Publiek recht
Educational team
Guido Van Limberghen (course titular)
Activities and contact hours
450 contact hours Independent or External Form of Study
Course Content

In an introductory lecture, the master thesis’ coordinator explains the concept and all practical issues with regard to this course. This information will be available in the Canvas course in the form of video recordings, slides and documents.

In this course the student executes a practically-oriented assignment or conducts a research relevant for legal science in the field of social law. The assignment or research topic should be connected to one of the courses of the study programme. Students choose the subject of their assignment or research themselves or select a topic from the list available in the Canvas course.

The practically-oriented paper can for instance consist of the writing of a statute proposal, a policy advice, the implementation of an enterprise’s occupational pension plan, etc. In their paper (35-40 pages, including a reference list), student describe and analyze the executed assignment and reflect critically about it. They formulate the legal questions which have arisen, explain and motivate the applied methodology, and present the results of their work. Students formulate solutions or propositions and indicate the limits or uncertainty thereof.

Course material
Handbook (Recommended) : Het juridisch verwerkingsproces, Eggermont Frederic, Geuens Maaike, Ginis B., Gowie Frank, Timbermont Evelien, Die Keure, 9789048632053, 2017
Handbook (Recommended) : Juridisch schrijven in de praktijk, P. Schoukens, K., Hendrickx en E. Terryn, 3ed, Leuven, Acco, 9789463797511, 2019
Handbook (Recommended) : Handleiding juridisch schrijven, G. Bouckaert en B. De Moor, 2ed, Antwerpen, Maklu, 9789062157334, 2004
Digital course material (Recommended) : Juridische verwijzingen en afkortingen, Interuniversitaire Commissie, http://www.legalworld.be/legalworld/juridische-verwijzingen-en-afkortingen.html?LangType=2067, 2017
Handbook (Recommended) : Praktijkboek rechtsmethodologie, Inleiding tot het opzoeken en analyseren van de bronnen van het nationaal, Europees en internationaal recht, Eggermont, F., Smis, S., & Paepe, P., Scheurs, W., Brugge, Die Keure, 9980000142171, 2023
Additional info

For additional information, please contact the master thesis coordinator Guido Van Limberghen and consult the master thesis guidelines of the program. In the first weeks of the academic year an introductory master lecture will be organized.

The course unit cannot be taken with credit contract.

Learning Outcomes

General competencies

  • Students can detect legal questions related to social law which arise from a particular problem, find the relevant sources, formulate science based solutions, and communicate their findings in a clear and concise manner, orally as well as in writing.
  • Students can investigate a social law problem analytically and synthetically, at academic level.
  • Students develop a critical and reflective attitude towards methodologies and methods of working, as well as towards the results of their own and other people’s research.
  • Students solve autonomously problems of social law and are aware of the limits or uncertainty of formulated solutions or propositions.
  • Students have a thorough and comprehensive knowledge of the parts of social law which are relevant for his topic.
  • Students understand the connexion between the international and/or European rules and the national law regarding his topic.
  • Students are confident in their ability in monitoring autonomously the developments in the field of social legislation and case law and are able to acquire new knowledge in social law.

Grading

The final grade is composed based on the following categories:
Master Thesis determines 100% of the final mark.

Within the Master Thesis category, the following assignments need to be completed:

  • Master Thesis with a relative weight of 100 which comprises 100% of the final mark.

Additional info regarding evaluation

The oral presentation and defense determines 25% of the final mark, the written part 75%.

The paper determines 100% of the mark for the written part.

The use of generative AI is allowed only for spelling and grammar checking and for translations.

STUDENTS MUST OBTAIN AT LEAST 50% OF THE POINTS FOR THE WRITTEN PART AND 50% OF THE POINTS FOR ORAL PART.

Students who failed in the first examination time, hand in a new version of their paper in the second examination time (August-September). They will be submitted to a new presentation and defense. They are not allowed to change this course for the course Master Thesis SORE with internship between the first examination time and the second.

Students who obtained at least 50% for the written part, can, if they wish to do so, keep that mark, and are presumed to take this option in case they don’t submit a new paper. In this case, they are submitted only to a new presentation and defense.

Students who fail in the second examination time can, in the following academic year, either present and defend a new paper or submit a further elaborated version of their paper, or switch to the course Master Thesis SORE witht internship.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND METHOD

1. Oral presentation and defense

Presentation: attractive and well structured; replying to the critique in the evaluation reports. 
Defense: knowledge and insight shown by answering the question on the written part. 
Evaluation: master thesis jury by means of a scale of values. 

2.2. Paper

  1. Formulation of the definition of the problem, research questions and relevancy of the research
  2. Adequacy of the applied methodology
  3. Integrated analysis and sense of synthesis of sufficient and recent sources
  4. Thorough knowledge of and insight into the relevant law
  5. Critical and unprejudiced attitude: weighing of pros and cons of possible solutions, taking up position, originality of the research, and awarnesse of the limits or uncertainty of formulated solutions or propositions
  6. Language and references

Evaluation: supervisor and commissioner by means of an evaluation form and a scale of values
The supervisor and commissioner state the reasons for their evaluations in a report communicated, via MaThis, to the students, not later than 3 days before the presentation and defense.

Allowed unsatisfactory mark
The supplementary Teaching and Examination Regulations of your faculty stipulate whether an allowed unsatisfactory mark for this programme unit is permitted.

Academic context

This offer is part of the following study plans:
Master of Social Law: Standaard traject (only offered in Dutch)